這是美國經濟學家Becker最新部落格文章
他說
去[2008]年10月7日
他為華爾街月刊寫了一篇文章叫做
「我們不是邁向大蕭條」("We're Not Headed for a Depression")
這一次我們不是蕭條
更完全不像1930年代的大蕭條
當經濟逐漸下滑時
他還有點擔心自己的預測看來有點愚蠢
跟許多著名的預測一樣
但是他很幸運地
這個世界也是一樣幸運
預言顯得基本上正確
8月9日他在部落格上宣稱
當前世界的衰退已經結束
許多經濟學者跟官方組織
也獲得相同結論
此次衰退是巨大的跟全球性的
但是它不是大蕭條──
大蕭條是指產出上的下滑(output fall )達10%以上
美國跟世界這次的產出上的下滑卻低於5%
在大蕭條期間
美國失業率攀高到25%
而且一直維持高點在整個30年代
產出滑落則超過20%
而在這次或以前的衰退
產出滑落稍稍低於4%
而失業率仍維持低於10%──
最新失業率數字是9.7%
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Productivity, Unemployment, and the End of the Recession-Becker
September 9, 2009
http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/archives/2009/09/productivity_un.html
On October 7, 2008 I wrote an op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal ("We're Not Headed for a Depression") in which I said there would not be a depression, certainly nothing at all resembling the Great Depression of the 1930s. As the economy continued to decline after that I began to worry that my predictions were going to look foolish, and become famous as one of the many absurdly bad forecasts.
Fortunately for me, and even more so for the world, the forecast turned out to be basically correct. I recently claimed in a post on this blog on August 9th that the current world recession is over, and many economists and official organizations since then have come to the same conclusion. The recession was big and world wide, but it was far from a depression-a rule of thumb is that a contraction is a depression only if the fall in output is at least 10%. The output fall in the US and the world has been less than 5%. Indeed, this recession is hardly more severe in the US- the epicenter of the financial crisis - than a couple of previous recessions, such as the one from 1973-75 brought on by the first oil shock, and the one in 1981-83 resulting from the Fed's successful efforts to squeeze inflation out of the system.
During the Great Depression American unemployment peaked at 25% and was high during the whole of the 1930s, while output declined by more than 20%. During this present (or past) recession, output has fallen by a little over 4%, and unemployment so far has remained under 10%-the latest figure gives an unemployment rate of 9.7%. Since a world of difference exists between the two events, the prevalent fear of a major depression was never realized.
Those who are more pessimistic about this recession point out that unemployment is still rising, and may reach a much higher level than its present rate. They also rightly indicate that total unemployment and underemployment is much higher than 9.7% because some persons have only found part time jobs, while others have been so discouraged by the weak labor market that they quit looking for work, and so are not counted as unemployed.
I will take up both aspects of this pessimism in turn. To understand what has been happening to unemployment, it is crucial to recognize that employment has declined, and unemployment has risen, much more relative to output during this recession than in past recessions because labor productivity-measured by output per worker or per hour of employment- has continued to grow during the recession. Productivity grew by 0.3% during the first quarter of 2009, and by a whopping 1.8% during the second quarter. Typically, measured productivity falls during serious recessions because of excess capacity of capital and the many employed workers who are underutilized. Basic arithmetic indicates that for any given fall in output, the greater the rise in measured labor productivity, the greater the fall in employment, and the greater the increase in unemployment.
Unemployment is typically a lagging indicator in the sense that it usually begins to fall only months after output has started to increase again. Since I expect output to rise only a little in the US during the third quarter that will be over at the end of September, unemployment should continue to rise for a while, almost certainly surpassing 10% at its peak. However, if, as I expect, the growth in productivity will continue into the future at a good pace because of the many innovations and inventions coming on line, that will lead to greater, not a lesser, growth in employment. For at some point, the economics of the positive relation between productivity and employment becomes more powerful than the short-term arithmetic negative relation that occurs during recessions.
In the longer run, advances in productivity are partly produced by investments in R&D and other innovations that generate new products and new processes. Both new products and new production methods typically require investments in both physical and human capital. They also stimulate the use of more workers of various skills that utilize the greater capital stock. This is why over longer time periods, productivity advances and robust labor and capital markets in different economies are strongly positively, not negatively, related. For this reason, the continuing advances in productivity in the US and elsewhere will at first limit and then reverse the falls in employment and rises in unemployment.
It is true that the total underemployment rate during this recession would be well above the official unemployment rate of 9.7%. Some estimates put total underemployment at over 16%, which includes individuals who are reluctantly working only part-time, and also persons who have given up looking for work. However, apples have to be compared with apples, and in judging this recession relative to prior ones, the same calculations have to be made for these past recessions as well. Exactly the same type of growth in underemployment was operating in these prior recessions, and especially for the severe recession of the 1930s. Perhaps the fractions of reluctant part timers and persons who stopped looking for work are greater during the present recession than recessions than say in 1973-75, or 1981-83, but I have not seen any demonstration of this. My guess is that whatever differences exist, they are not enough to reverse the ordering of the severity of different post-war recessions.
My overall conclusion is that productivity advances will lead the world out of the recession, and after a while toward a decent rate of growth in world GDP. These advances will occur even if the financial sector is not fully recovered from its crisis. As productivity advances continue at robust levels, that will stimulate the demand for labor, and begin to reduce unemployment and produce sizable rates of growth in employment.
Posted by Gary Becker at 2:05 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1853
Comments
Post a comment
2009年9月9日 星期三
熱門文章
-
印象最深的是 他在接獲要發動波灣戰爭的指令後 兩小時後 就完成戰爭計畫 基本上的攻擊戰略 是從背後襲擊敵人 這一點當時震驚了全球新聞界 那時多半以為會採正面迎擊海珊部隊 後來證明是成功的戰爭計畫 他顯然是李德哈特{Lidele Hart}「間接策略」(indirect appr...
-
其實 龍應台就是白痴一枚 好當官 好為人師 傳統中國文人喜好舞文弄墨 對於政治小心翼翼 (以不得罪中共為前提 這是她之主子馬英九的作風) 對於行政一竅不通 所以開個莫名奇妙的李安回家座談 引發台灣影人大反彈 如今又引發中國維權人士批評 只因發言暗中擁護央視 ...
-
早說該廢除中央社了 libertytimes.com.tw自由時報 「總編裁示不發」中央社壓新聞露餡 緊急下架 已被備份瘋狂轉貼 〔記者蘇芳禾/台北報導〕中央社昨早發出「亞錦賽錯稱中國台北 抗議奏效」的新聞,詳述我方抗...
-
世大運柯P致詞提11次台灣英譯版「消音」剩1次... - 政治- 自由時報電子報 每個得牌選手都說這塊牌是獻給全體台灣人 可是籌辦主委柯偽特首英文版演講 卻特別避開Taiwan 這一點要讓所有台灣選手知道柯某邪惡的真面目! 這是中共玩的手法 內外有別 甚至兩岸都是...
-
台灣司法小暴君特偵組之司法叛變-- 特偵組要救越方如(遭控強迫辜仲諒作偽證案) 即將被廢除的特偵組 突然偵辦與規定職掌不相符之案件 明顯針對辜仲諒而來 明顯不是保家衛民 而是保護官位尤其是越方如
-
首先是楊永明前新聞局長 初上任時提出的 令人瞠目結舌的幸福新聞說 那是要把台灣打造成 跟北韓獨裁政權洗腦下產生出的 北韓人是全球最幸福國家的幻想嗎 接著是這幾天剛上任的公共電視台董事長 前任的新聞局長邵玉銘 所說的 要多多報導清純新聞 繼續追隨...
-
利用銀聯卡詐騙 半年在台領走百億 ltn自由時報 2015-10-02 境外提款額度 人行大幅限縮 〔記者邱俊福/台北報導〕「假檢警」詐騙集團橫行兩岸,今年上半年在台使用銀聯卡提領的贓款就高達百億台幣(一年相當於兩百億台幣),規模驚人,中國、台灣警方雖...
-
1例1休 美商會長酸小英:全場700人都要填加班單! - 政治 - 自由時報電子報 Albert Chang台北美國商會新任會長章錦華 你算甚麼東西 最好狗膽當面向習近平或川普嗆聲 台灣政府應學美國暫停他入台三個月 還以為台灣是美國殖民地嗎? -------...
-
黃越宏社長當庭訓斥吳曉婷檢察官辦頂新背信案不認真 開庭遲到10分鐘 還不知道政治獻金案已經不起訴 且還警告她要求書記官筆錄若不認真辦將到監察院檢舉 結果案子改由別人承辦 黃越宏說吳曉婷檢察官是典型吃案型檢察官 由她承辦馬英九大巨蛋案是要吃案