這是美國經濟學家Becker最新部落格文章
他說
去[2008]年10月7日
他為華爾街月刊寫了一篇文章叫做
「我們不是邁向大蕭條」("We're Not Headed for a Depression")
這一次我們不是蕭條
更完全不像1930年代的大蕭條
當經濟逐漸下滑時
他還有點擔心自己的預測看來有點愚蠢
跟許多著名的預測一樣
但是他很幸運地
這個世界也是一樣幸運
預言顯得基本上正確
8月9日他在部落格上宣稱
當前世界的衰退已經結束
許多經濟學者跟官方組織
也獲得相同結論
此次衰退是巨大的跟全球性的
但是它不是大蕭條──
大蕭條是指產出上的下滑(output fall )達10%以上
美國跟世界這次的產出上的下滑卻低於5%
在大蕭條期間
美國失業率攀高到25%
而且一直維持高點在整個30年代
產出滑落則超過20%
而在這次或以前的衰退
產出滑落稍稍低於4%
而失業率仍維持低於10%──
最新失業率數字是9.7%
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Productivity, Unemployment, and the End of the Recession-Becker
September 9, 2009
http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/archives/2009/09/productivity_un.html
On October 7, 2008 I wrote an op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal ("We're Not Headed for a Depression") in which I said there would not be a depression, certainly nothing at all resembling the Great Depression of the 1930s. As the economy continued to decline after that I began to worry that my predictions were going to look foolish, and become famous as one of the many absurdly bad forecasts.
Fortunately for me, and even more so for the world, the forecast turned out to be basically correct. I recently claimed in a post on this blog on August 9th that the current world recession is over, and many economists and official organizations since then have come to the same conclusion. The recession was big and world wide, but it was far from a depression-a rule of thumb is that a contraction is a depression only if the fall in output is at least 10%. The output fall in the US and the world has been less than 5%. Indeed, this recession is hardly more severe in the US- the epicenter of the financial crisis - than a couple of previous recessions, such as the one from 1973-75 brought on by the first oil shock, and the one in 1981-83 resulting from the Fed's successful efforts to squeeze inflation out of the system.
During the Great Depression American unemployment peaked at 25% and was high during the whole of the 1930s, while output declined by more than 20%. During this present (or past) recession, output has fallen by a little over 4%, and unemployment so far has remained under 10%-the latest figure gives an unemployment rate of 9.7%. Since a world of difference exists between the two events, the prevalent fear of a major depression was never realized.
Those who are more pessimistic about this recession point out that unemployment is still rising, and may reach a much higher level than its present rate. They also rightly indicate that total unemployment and underemployment is much higher than 9.7% because some persons have only found part time jobs, while others have been so discouraged by the weak labor market that they quit looking for work, and so are not counted as unemployed.
I will take up both aspects of this pessimism in turn. To understand what has been happening to unemployment, it is crucial to recognize that employment has declined, and unemployment has risen, much more relative to output during this recession than in past recessions because labor productivity-measured by output per worker or per hour of employment- has continued to grow during the recession. Productivity grew by 0.3% during the first quarter of 2009, and by a whopping 1.8% during the second quarter. Typically, measured productivity falls during serious recessions because of excess capacity of capital and the many employed workers who are underutilized. Basic arithmetic indicates that for any given fall in output, the greater the rise in measured labor productivity, the greater the fall in employment, and the greater the increase in unemployment.
Unemployment is typically a lagging indicator in the sense that it usually begins to fall only months after output has started to increase again. Since I expect output to rise only a little in the US during the third quarter that will be over at the end of September, unemployment should continue to rise for a while, almost certainly surpassing 10% at its peak. However, if, as I expect, the growth in productivity will continue into the future at a good pace because of the many innovations and inventions coming on line, that will lead to greater, not a lesser, growth in employment. For at some point, the economics of the positive relation between productivity and employment becomes more powerful than the short-term arithmetic negative relation that occurs during recessions.
In the longer run, advances in productivity are partly produced by investments in R&D and other innovations that generate new products and new processes. Both new products and new production methods typically require investments in both physical and human capital. They also stimulate the use of more workers of various skills that utilize the greater capital stock. This is why over longer time periods, productivity advances and robust labor and capital markets in different economies are strongly positively, not negatively, related. For this reason, the continuing advances in productivity in the US and elsewhere will at first limit and then reverse the falls in employment and rises in unemployment.
It is true that the total underemployment rate during this recession would be well above the official unemployment rate of 9.7%. Some estimates put total underemployment at over 16%, which includes individuals who are reluctantly working only part-time, and also persons who have given up looking for work. However, apples have to be compared with apples, and in judging this recession relative to prior ones, the same calculations have to be made for these past recessions as well. Exactly the same type of growth in underemployment was operating in these prior recessions, and especially for the severe recession of the 1930s. Perhaps the fractions of reluctant part timers and persons who stopped looking for work are greater during the present recession than recessions than say in 1973-75, or 1981-83, but I have not seen any demonstration of this. My guess is that whatever differences exist, they are not enough to reverse the ordering of the severity of different post-war recessions.
My overall conclusion is that productivity advances will lead the world out of the recession, and after a while toward a decent rate of growth in world GDP. These advances will occur even if the financial sector is not fully recovered from its crisis. As productivity advances continue at robust levels, that will stimulate the demand for labor, and begin to reduce unemployment and produce sizable rates of growth in employment.
Posted by Gary Becker at 2:05 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1853
Comments
Post a comment
2009年9月9日 星期三
熱門文章
-
Japan Needs More Brawling Billionaires bloomberg Olympus Corp corruptin see: http://worldwatch-worldwatch.blogspot.tw/2013/10/e...
-
胡佳是完全否定中共政權的正當性及統治的合法性 別忘記牛頓第三定律「作用力與反作用力定律」: 每一個作用力都對應著一個相等反抗的反作用力。 也就是說,兩個物體彼此施加於對方的力總是大小相等、方向相反。 中共施政的壓迫力必然產生相等相反的反作用力「反對勢力」 看起...
-
看這一則自由之家上個月剛發布的新聞 吉爾吉斯政府中斷了自由歐洲電台跟美國之音電台的傳送 要求他們必須將節目事前送審 因為這些節目對該國政府太負面與批判性 是不是跟林益世的立法院提案 要求公視必須事前審查 並藉由預算凍結控制 一模一樣嗎? 可見專制政權掌控媒體之步數與心態 完全相同...
-
日職》陽岱鋼披巨人2號?過去曾有台灣人穿過 2016/12/09 08:24 陽岱鋼可能穿上巨人二號?(取自產經體育) 〔體育中心/綜合報導〕日媒《產經體育》頭條報導,巨人軍願意將「2號」讓給陽岱鋼...
-
中國異議人士唐柏橋說得好 只有以美國施壓台灣政府 馬英九舊習的陸委會濫用美台免簽證優惠 拒絕持美國難民證的中國難民(當然沒有中國籍跟護照)入台 不知這是美台互惠關係默契或條件(拒絕美證等於拒絕美國護照是對美極大羞辱與背信) 中國異議人士 郭寶勝跟唐柏橋反映得好 持美國難...
-
台灣禁煙令於 2009年1月11日 開始執行 最令人感到荒謬的 是所有香菸包裝 都必須刊登叫人噁心反感的恐嚇警告圖片 其實 限制吸煙區域跟場合是合理的 但是包含連私人[及營業]活動場合 都不允許 那就太過火極端了 記得好幾年前 倡議反煙的柴松林教授在電視節...
-
第一件當然是本土電影海角七號最後以113天放映之最長紀錄 以及 台灣有史以來僅次於鐵達尼號之賣座票房5.2億台幣 這都是歸功於 網絡傳頌與口耳相傳之口碑 加上大約九月份後平面媒體如聯合報及水果報之頭版頭條報導 可說有史以來之推波助瀾之效果 第二件則是 陳雲林來台之台灣民眾自主動員...
-
大陸政策 丁渝洲:美方及綠營支持不可少 http://news.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-News/2007Cti-News-Content/0,4521,110502+112009010200182,00.html
-
已婚教師福瑞斯特(Jeremy Forrest)誘拐女童,畏罪潛逃法國遭到逮捕。(路透社) 可惡的台灣女名校教官應該像這位 美國男教師誘拐女學生潛逃一樣 上手銬加以逮捕! 台灣高中校園常見這種年輕氣盛 大約30多歲之軍訓教官 若是派駐...
-
KMT的逃亡以1949為最大規模 1972美國撤退、蔣政權被UN驅逐、英美日等列強撤銷國家與政府承認 是另一波KMT的島內大逃亡。 CCP現在也顯示部分的逃亡跡象: 2013年出逃中國資金將高達一兆五千億美元之多。 2012中國出現的薄熙來治下的王立軍叛逃投靠美國...