這是美國經濟學家Becker最新部落格文章
他說
去[2008]年10月7日
他為華爾街月刊寫了一篇文章叫做
「我們不是邁向大蕭條」("We're Not Headed for a Depression")
這一次我們不是蕭條
更完全不像1930年代的大蕭條
當經濟逐漸下滑時
他還有點擔心自己的預測看來有點愚蠢
跟許多著名的預測一樣
但是他很幸運地
這個世界也是一樣幸運
預言顯得基本上正確
8月9日他在部落格上宣稱
當前世界的衰退已經結束
許多經濟學者跟官方組織
也獲得相同結論
此次衰退是巨大的跟全球性的
但是它不是大蕭條──
大蕭條是指產出上的下滑(output fall )達10%以上
美國跟世界這次的產出上的下滑卻低於5%
在大蕭條期間
美國失業率攀高到25%
而且一直維持高點在整個30年代
產出滑落則超過20%
而在這次或以前的衰退
產出滑落稍稍低於4%
而失業率仍維持低於10%──
最新失業率數字是9.7%
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Productivity, Unemployment, and the End of the Recession-Becker
September 9, 2009
http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/archives/2009/09/productivity_un.html
On October 7, 2008 I wrote an op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal ("We're Not Headed for a Depression") in which I said there would not be a depression, certainly nothing at all resembling the Great Depression of the 1930s. As the economy continued to decline after that I began to worry that my predictions were going to look foolish, and become famous as one of the many absurdly bad forecasts.
Fortunately for me, and even more so for the world, the forecast turned out to be basically correct. I recently claimed in a post on this blog on August 9th that the current world recession is over, and many economists and official organizations since then have come to the same conclusion. The recession was big and world wide, but it was far from a depression-a rule of thumb is that a contraction is a depression only if the fall in output is at least 10%. The output fall in the US and the world has been less than 5%. Indeed, this recession is hardly more severe in the US- the epicenter of the financial crisis - than a couple of previous recessions, such as the one from 1973-75 brought on by the first oil shock, and the one in 1981-83 resulting from the Fed's successful efforts to squeeze inflation out of the system.
During the Great Depression American unemployment peaked at 25% and was high during the whole of the 1930s, while output declined by more than 20%. During this present (or past) recession, output has fallen by a little over 4%, and unemployment so far has remained under 10%-the latest figure gives an unemployment rate of 9.7%. Since a world of difference exists between the two events, the prevalent fear of a major depression was never realized.
Those who are more pessimistic about this recession point out that unemployment is still rising, and may reach a much higher level than its present rate. They also rightly indicate that total unemployment and underemployment is much higher than 9.7% because some persons have only found part time jobs, while others have been so discouraged by the weak labor market that they quit looking for work, and so are not counted as unemployed.
I will take up both aspects of this pessimism in turn. To understand what has been happening to unemployment, it is crucial to recognize that employment has declined, and unemployment has risen, much more relative to output during this recession than in past recessions because labor productivity-measured by output per worker or per hour of employment- has continued to grow during the recession. Productivity grew by 0.3% during the first quarter of 2009, and by a whopping 1.8% during the second quarter. Typically, measured productivity falls during serious recessions because of excess capacity of capital and the many employed workers who are underutilized. Basic arithmetic indicates that for any given fall in output, the greater the rise in measured labor productivity, the greater the fall in employment, and the greater the increase in unemployment.
Unemployment is typically a lagging indicator in the sense that it usually begins to fall only months after output has started to increase again. Since I expect output to rise only a little in the US during the third quarter that will be over at the end of September, unemployment should continue to rise for a while, almost certainly surpassing 10% at its peak. However, if, as I expect, the growth in productivity will continue into the future at a good pace because of the many innovations and inventions coming on line, that will lead to greater, not a lesser, growth in employment. For at some point, the economics of the positive relation between productivity and employment becomes more powerful than the short-term arithmetic negative relation that occurs during recessions.
In the longer run, advances in productivity are partly produced by investments in R&D and other innovations that generate new products and new processes. Both new products and new production methods typically require investments in both physical and human capital. They also stimulate the use of more workers of various skills that utilize the greater capital stock. This is why over longer time periods, productivity advances and robust labor and capital markets in different economies are strongly positively, not negatively, related. For this reason, the continuing advances in productivity in the US and elsewhere will at first limit and then reverse the falls in employment and rises in unemployment.
It is true that the total underemployment rate during this recession would be well above the official unemployment rate of 9.7%. Some estimates put total underemployment at over 16%, which includes individuals who are reluctantly working only part-time, and also persons who have given up looking for work. However, apples have to be compared with apples, and in judging this recession relative to prior ones, the same calculations have to be made for these past recessions as well. Exactly the same type of growth in underemployment was operating in these prior recessions, and especially for the severe recession of the 1930s. Perhaps the fractions of reluctant part timers and persons who stopped looking for work are greater during the present recession than recessions than say in 1973-75, or 1981-83, but I have not seen any demonstration of this. My guess is that whatever differences exist, they are not enough to reverse the ordering of the severity of different post-war recessions.
My overall conclusion is that productivity advances will lead the world out of the recession, and after a while toward a decent rate of growth in world GDP. These advances will occur even if the financial sector is not fully recovered from its crisis. As productivity advances continue at robust levels, that will stimulate the demand for labor, and begin to reduce unemployment and produce sizable rates of growth in employment.
Posted by Gary Becker at 2:05 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1853
Comments
Post a comment
2009年9月9日 星期三
熱門文章
-
2014-04-23 14:39 http://news.ltn自由時報 〔本報訊〕日前有一對中國夫妻在香港旺角,讓小女兒隨地便溺,被香港年輕人包圍、錄影存證並報警,事情鬧得轟轟烈烈。消息傳回中國,不滿的中國網友 發起「6月1日起不去香港行動」,聲稱「我們是消費者、我們是...
-
20190411 不要臉的英派蔡英文博壞賭 臨時有人參加黨內總統初選 就開始玩變更遊戲規則手法 初選期程延後 真是可悲啊
-
楊文嘉講得對 打擊魔鬼不要自己也變成魔鬼 但是他們的討論都忽略一個關鍵問題 台灣其實身處「後威權」體制 要處理這些政治弊案 如楊子嘉姚立明等人所討論的 並無可依傍的體制管道可以去處理 (特偵組地檢署政風機關之廉政署等等都不動監察院也是) 在西方之正常先進民主國家 ...
-
2013年3月5日 (綜合報道)(星島日報報道)在本港有不少 基金客,宏利金融(945)旗下的宏利資產管理,昨日被證監會公開譴責兼罰款2400萬元,因宏利連續5年違規分銷旗下環球基金產品,未有跟足要求評估和 配對客戶風險,干犯嚴重內部監控缺失。這是歷來涉及金融產品銷售監...
-
黃越宏稱「12%司法官貪污」 今遭不明男子毆打 - 社會 - 自由時報電子報 台灣司法反動派的反撲--以前直接用暗殺的 或是法庭羅織罪名 現在則是派出打手毆打批評者 跟納粹黨衛隊一模一樣 台灣司法果真是法西斯本質 罵黃「你在電視上囂張什麼?」、 「說什麼...
-
To be able to do something as well as others is not enouth either. It does not give the leadership position without which a besiness is doom...
-
2013-3-17 位於法國西南部城市波爾多加隆河上的「傑克.沙邦.德瑪」大橋16日正式啟用,這座橋造價1.6億歐元(約台幣62億元),也是全歐最高的垂直升降橋,支撐升降橋面的4座塔高度為77公尺 。 vertical lift bridges
-
[爆卦] 猜測赤燭為何會埋梗還願又事後道歉 應該是發夢文吧 也可以說是另一種陰謀論發酵衍生品 如果真有這樣的三部曲: 「返校detention」→「還願devotion」→「噤聲detection」 那這個台灣獨立開發團隊 就真的是太厲害了 可是 從以下兩件...
-
--根本就是藏富於海外 其實應該立法鼓勵捐獻美術館免稅 資本主義就是要累積財富與資本 台灣萬萬稅根本變相逼迫富人逃稅 先進國家為什麼那麼多富豪捐獻美術館 除了投資增值與美學蒐藏外 更重要是國家立法鼓勵類似捐獻免稅 王永慶家族海外金庫曝光海外資產是台灣3.4倍-...
-
陳水扁前總統任內曾被某位數學教授 公開說A了多少多少錢 結果法庭傳喚後 他說是在某車站聽婦人說的 後被判無罪 此事件雖證實為無 但是其他如總統夫人吳淑珍 在官邸之行徑 卻大受非議 美國大法官曾解釋說 名人享有名人之特權 因此應該忍受相當之不自由 這是正確的言論自由 ...
總網頁瀏覽量
95689