這是美國經濟學家Becker最新部落格文章
他說
去[2008]年10月7日
他為華爾街月刊寫了一篇文章叫做
「我們不是邁向大蕭條」("We're Not Headed for a Depression")
這一次我們不是蕭條
更完全不像1930年代的大蕭條
當經濟逐漸下滑時
他還有點擔心自己的預測看來有點愚蠢
跟許多著名的預測一樣
但是他很幸運地
這個世界也是一樣幸運
預言顯得基本上正確
8月9日他在部落格上宣稱
當前世界的衰退已經結束
許多經濟學者跟官方組織
也獲得相同結論
此次衰退是巨大的跟全球性的
但是它不是大蕭條──
大蕭條是指產出上的下滑(output fall )達10%以上
美國跟世界這次的產出上的下滑卻低於5%
在大蕭條期間
美國失業率攀高到25%
而且一直維持高點在整個30年代
產出滑落則超過20%
而在這次或以前的衰退
產出滑落稍稍低於4%
而失業率仍維持低於10%──
最新失業率數字是9.7%
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Productivity, Unemployment, and the End of the Recession-Becker
September 9, 2009
http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/archives/2009/09/productivity_un.html
On October 7, 2008 I wrote an op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal ("We're Not Headed for a Depression") in which I said there would not be a depression, certainly nothing at all resembling the Great Depression of the 1930s. As the economy continued to decline after that I began to worry that my predictions were going to look foolish, and become famous as one of the many absurdly bad forecasts.
Fortunately for me, and even more so for the world, the forecast turned out to be basically correct. I recently claimed in a post on this blog on August 9th that the current world recession is over, and many economists and official organizations since then have come to the same conclusion. The recession was big and world wide, but it was far from a depression-a rule of thumb is that a contraction is a depression only if the fall in output is at least 10%. The output fall in the US and the world has been less than 5%. Indeed, this recession is hardly more severe in the US- the epicenter of the financial crisis - than a couple of previous recessions, such as the one from 1973-75 brought on by the first oil shock, and the one in 1981-83 resulting from the Fed's successful efforts to squeeze inflation out of the system.
During the Great Depression American unemployment peaked at 25% and was high during the whole of the 1930s, while output declined by more than 20%. During this present (or past) recession, output has fallen by a little over 4%, and unemployment so far has remained under 10%-the latest figure gives an unemployment rate of 9.7%. Since a world of difference exists between the two events, the prevalent fear of a major depression was never realized.
Those who are more pessimistic about this recession point out that unemployment is still rising, and may reach a much higher level than its present rate. They also rightly indicate that total unemployment and underemployment is much higher than 9.7% because some persons have only found part time jobs, while others have been so discouraged by the weak labor market that they quit looking for work, and so are not counted as unemployed.
I will take up both aspects of this pessimism in turn. To understand what has been happening to unemployment, it is crucial to recognize that employment has declined, and unemployment has risen, much more relative to output during this recession than in past recessions because labor productivity-measured by output per worker or per hour of employment- has continued to grow during the recession. Productivity grew by 0.3% during the first quarter of 2009, and by a whopping 1.8% during the second quarter. Typically, measured productivity falls during serious recessions because of excess capacity of capital and the many employed workers who are underutilized. Basic arithmetic indicates that for any given fall in output, the greater the rise in measured labor productivity, the greater the fall in employment, and the greater the increase in unemployment.
Unemployment is typically a lagging indicator in the sense that it usually begins to fall only months after output has started to increase again. Since I expect output to rise only a little in the US during the third quarter that will be over at the end of September, unemployment should continue to rise for a while, almost certainly surpassing 10% at its peak. However, if, as I expect, the growth in productivity will continue into the future at a good pace because of the many innovations and inventions coming on line, that will lead to greater, not a lesser, growth in employment. For at some point, the economics of the positive relation between productivity and employment becomes more powerful than the short-term arithmetic negative relation that occurs during recessions.
In the longer run, advances in productivity are partly produced by investments in R&D and other innovations that generate new products and new processes. Both new products and new production methods typically require investments in both physical and human capital. They also stimulate the use of more workers of various skills that utilize the greater capital stock. This is why over longer time periods, productivity advances and robust labor and capital markets in different economies are strongly positively, not negatively, related. For this reason, the continuing advances in productivity in the US and elsewhere will at first limit and then reverse the falls in employment and rises in unemployment.
It is true that the total underemployment rate during this recession would be well above the official unemployment rate of 9.7%. Some estimates put total underemployment at over 16%, which includes individuals who are reluctantly working only part-time, and also persons who have given up looking for work. However, apples have to be compared with apples, and in judging this recession relative to prior ones, the same calculations have to be made for these past recessions as well. Exactly the same type of growth in underemployment was operating in these prior recessions, and especially for the severe recession of the 1930s. Perhaps the fractions of reluctant part timers and persons who stopped looking for work are greater during the present recession than recessions than say in 1973-75, or 1981-83, but I have not seen any demonstration of this. My guess is that whatever differences exist, they are not enough to reverse the ordering of the severity of different post-war recessions.
My overall conclusion is that productivity advances will lead the world out of the recession, and after a while toward a decent rate of growth in world GDP. These advances will occur even if the financial sector is not fully recovered from its crisis. As productivity advances continue at robust levels, that will stimulate the demand for labor, and begin to reduce unemployment and produce sizable rates of growth in employment.
Posted by Gary Becker at 2:05 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1853
Comments
Post a comment
2009年9月9日 星期三
熱門文章
-
(捷運目標價:15元) 馬英九前車之鑑,柯文哲請三思 appledaily蘋果日報 若一家有三人皆需要乘坐捷運上班、上課,上班以北投到台北車站24元漲至30元計算,上課以到石牌國中16元漲至 20元計算,6+6+4=16,每天需多負擔16元,乘上2015年上班日2...
-
繼戴立忍、水原希子向中國澄清與道歉後 中國網路酸民展開 #第一屆向中國道歉大賽 各自敘述 中國討人厭的原因 --------------------------------------------------------------- 我玩微博卻在主頁散播台獨思想(...
-
Is 'The Five Eyes Alliance' Conspiring to Spy on You? The dire threat of surveillance agencies working together to keep an eye on...
-
US military launch Sea Hunter, a self-driving warship – video(theguardian) 美軍自動駕駛軍艦下水 命名「海獵人」 ...
-
The Cyprus Bailout in One Picture: The picture shows the EURO central holds a bigger gun aiming at cyprus The Cyprus bailout ...
-
http://news.tvbs.com.tw/entry/513801 同是抗議!台丟鞋罰5千 港「與狼共桌」 沈船家屬炮轟政府救援不力,向南韓總理鄭烘原(箭嘴示)怒擲水樽 難得TVBS會批評馬江國民黨政權 記得3月太陽花學運期 某晚上在牛肉麵店吃麵 前方坐一...
-
果然是台灣的超級大米蟲 每個退職的萬年代表都領取了優渥的「退職酬金」 (約500多萬元,當年這筆錢可買好幾棟房子了) 且「第一屆資深中央民意代表自願退職條 」準用享有18%的優惠存款利息 25年拿走國庫60億、18%領到死,為何年金改革漏掉這群人? ...
-
基本上這是一場明顯的政治判決 就是指隨著政治實力消長 [泛藍選舉於2007與2008大勝] 法院與法官觀風看勢因人而異 作出無罪判決 去看看接下來 1106陳雲林特使來台被起訴的人 及之後推動野草莓學運相關人士 違反集遊法被起訴的人 會有怎樣不同結果 就可做...
-
racial discrimination and racial hatred in Taiwan Bully Who Insulted Interracial Couple on Taiwanese Train Gets Justice After Viral Vi...
-
蔡英文政軍人事馬規蔡隨 因循苟且 鄉愿欠創新 不能說是馬核定的名單 就照單全收 你也應該有自己主見才對 真的應了少數獨派對小英為人處事的觀察:有時難免過於鄉愿 這種因循苟且的人事任命致命後果就是 整個國軍高層嚴重阻塞創新改革的動能 塞滿了老舊思維與風格的領軍...